Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
+  Linux Soft Forum
|-+  Cercetează» Reţele, servere» lighttpd: interpretare access.log
[Picture 161] [Picture 160] [Picture 159]
Username:
Password:
 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: lighttpd: interpretare access.log  (Read 1384 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
floorin
Membru
*

« on: February 11, 2009, 03:36:34 PM »

in access.log am liniile urmatoare
172.23.20.10 - - [10/Feb/2009:09:19:03 -0500] "HEAD / HTTP\1.0" 400 0 "-" "-"
172.23.20.10 - - [10/Feb/2009:09:19:15 -0500] "" 400 349 "-" "-"
172.23.20.10 - - [10/Feb/2009:09:19:15 -0500] "" 400 349 "-" "-"
172.23.20.10 - - [10/Feb/2009:09:19:15 -0500] "" 400 349 "-" "-"
172.23.20.10 - - [10/Feb/2009:09:19:15 -0500] "" 400 349 "-" "-"
172.23.20.10 - - [10/Feb/2009:09:19:15 -0500] "" 400 349 "-" "-"
ce concluzie ar trebui sa trag din ele? ce s-a intamplat?
« Last Edit: February 11, 2009, 03:47:13 PM by floorin » Logged
Saltwater
Veteran
**

Whatever™


WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2009, 09:40:05 AM »

Cel mai probabil entry-uri corupte cauzate de bad requests (vad ca toate returneaza 400). Pe serverele din productie, in general, undeva pana la maxim 5% dintre intrarile din log sunt corupte. O chestie precum AWStats ar putea sa ti-l analizeze mai bine.
Logged



Astazi nu am semnatura.
asd
Membru
*

Lumea ii rea! Oamenii's buni!


« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2009, 11:08:25 AM »

care e treaba cu acest server? e mai bun ca apache-ul?
Logged
gheorghe
Veteran
**


« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2009, 01:27:24 PM »

Depinde.
Logged
asd
Membru
*

Lumea ii rea! Oamenii's buni!


« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2009, 02:22:48 PM »

e un proiect separat de apache si la ce ar fi bun? eu ma joc cu xamp care are apache-u?
are performante mai bune la viteza? usor de configurat?
Logged
gheorghe
Veteran
**


« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2009, 10:43:17 PM »

Depinde. Nimic.
Depinde. E la fel.
« Last Edit: March 18, 2009, 10:44:03 PM by gheorghe » Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: